RESEARCH ARTICLE


Mob Mentality: Effect of a Mobbing Playback on Avian Detection Probabilities during Point Count Surveys



Brian R. Mitchell1, *, Therese Donovan2
1 Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA and
2 Vermont Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, United States Geological Survey, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 86
Abstract HTML Views: 652
PDF Downloads: 206
Total Views/Downloads: 944
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 61
Abstract HTML Views: 489
PDF Downloads: 158
Total Views/Downloads: 708



© 2008 Mitchell and Donovan

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Northeast Temperate Network, National Park Service, 54 Elm Street, Woodstock, Vermont, 05091, USA; Tel: 802-457-3368, Ext. 37; Fax: 802-457-3405; E-mail: brian_r_mitchell@nps.gov


Abstract

The probability of detecting an individual or species is an important parameter in studies using mark-recapture and occupancy models to estimate population sizes and occurrence. Because low detection probabilities result in biased estimators and decreased precision, biologists seek methods that maximize detection probability. We evaluated whether we could increase detections of bird species by playing a tape of Black-capped Chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) mobbing calls during point counts. We conducted trios of 10-minute counts (two pre-playback and a playback) at 684 stations throughout Vermont, in forested, agricultural/grassland, and developed habitats. For each of 73 species detected during the surveys, we used occupancy modeling and information-theoretic model selection and averaging methods to evaluate whether detection probabilities varied due to playback or habitat type. Models containing a playback effect accounted for over 90% of the Akaike weights for 41 species. With 15 of these species, habitat effects also accounted for over 90% of the Akaike weights. The playback increased estimated detection probability in all habitats for 14 species, decreased estimated detection probability for 20 species, and had an estimated effect that varied by habitat for 7 species (many species with habitat effects simply had differing magnitudes of the effect dependent on habitat). Smaller resident species were detected more often during tape playbacks, but responses were highly variable for most species and the responses did not appear to follow a taxonomic pattern. We encourage researchers to evaluate their list of target species carefully before deciding to use mobbing playbacks to enhance response rates; in many situations mobbing tapes will not enhance detections and may complicate the interpretation of model parameters.

Keywords: Detection probability, habitat differences, mobbing, model selection, occupancy models, Vermont.