RESEARCH ARTICLE


Winter Fat Storage and Vertical Microenvironmental Gradients: Experimental Test of an Alternative Hypothesis



Christopher M. Rogers*
Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University, Wichita KS 67260, USA


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 97
Abstract HTML Views: 325
PDF Downloads: 154
Total Views/Downloads: 576
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 76
Abstract HTML Views: 236
PDF Downloads: 125
Total Views/Downloads: 437



© 2008 Christopher M. Rogers

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University, Wichita KS 67260, USA; Tel: 316-978-6767; Fax: 316-978-3772; E-mail: chris.rogers@wichita.edu


Abstract

Cost-benefit optimal body mass models have become a cornerstone of behavioral ecology of the nonbreeding period of birds, and make the prediction that fat will increase with increasing deterioration of feeding conditions. Tests of this prediction have relied on comparing fat stores of birds along a vertical height gradient of resource unpredictability (greater snowfall nearer the ground), and lower fat levels in tree-feeders compared with ground-feeders supported the prediction in previous studies. Alternatively, as predation risk is often cited as a cost of fat storage, lower fat stores may be caused by greater predation risk higher in the vertical resource gradient compared with the ground microenvironment. Among three species of tree-feeding birds wintering in south-central Kansas, foraging birds frequently preferred a higher sunflower feeder over a similar lower one, with blind and microenvironmental effects considered indirectly. Interspecific dominance rank was significantly and positively correlated with body size. Social dominants frequently displaced subordinates from the higher to the lower feeder. Thus a minimum of fat in tree-feeding species that can be explained by predictable resources (low snowfall), not high costs, underscoring the low benefit to fat in this winter foraging guild. Future resource-based tests of optimal fat models will need to measure both costs and benefits of fat in different winter foraging guilds.

Keywords: Winter, fat, birds, predation, foraging, optimality.